• Macro Notes
  • Posts
  • Quarterly Report Cards May Be Getting Curved, And Long-Term Stocks Could Love The Grading Change

Quarterly Report Cards May Be Getting Curved, And Long-Term Stocks Could Love The Grading Change

The SEC may make quarterly reports optional. That could reward long-cycle builders over quarter chasers.

The SEC is preparing a proposal that could make quarterly reporting optional and let public companies report results twice a year instead.

If that sticks, the market may spend a little less time obsessing over every 90-day wobble and a little more time rewarding businesses that build value over longer stretches.

That will not eliminate earnings season drama, but it could shift the advantage toward companies that already think in years instead of quarters.

Rocket Stock (Sponsored)

Bloomberg is calling Elon Musk's upcoming SpaceX IPO "the biggest listing of ALL TIME."

But here's the thing - most investors will be locked out until AFTER it goes public.

Not you.

I've found a 'backdoor' that lets everyday Americans grab a pre-IPO stake in SpaceX right now.

Click Here for the FREE "SpaceX" Ticker

The proposal would not ban quarterly updates. It would make them optional.

Companies could still report every three months, but the rule would no longer force all of them into that schedule.

The SEC could publish the proposal as soon as next month, then open it for public comment before any final vote. 

That sounds procedural, but the market implications are more interesting than they look.

First, it changes the incentive structure.
A lot of executives say public markets push them toward short-term decisions because every quarter becomes a referendum.

Supporters of semiannual reporting think easing that cadence could reduce clerical burden, make public listings more attractive, and let management teams focus more on capital allocation, product cycles, and multi-year strategy. 

Second, it raises the value of trust.
If investors get fewer mandated check-ins, they will likely place a higher premium on companies with clean business models, recurring revenue, and management teams that already communicate clearly.

Businesses that need constant hand-holding to explain every quarter may not benefit much. Companies with durable economics and long runways may benefit more.

Third, it could widen the gap between operators and storytellers.
Less frequent required reporting can help businesses that invest through cycles, especially in software, design tools, specialty industrials, and other areas where near-term volatility often masks long-term value creation.

But it can also reduce transparency, which is why some investors will push back hard. The likely result is not a simple risk-on move. It is a sorting event. 

There is also a global context here.

Europe and the U.K. already moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting years ago, though many companies still report quarterly anyway.

Canada’s top exchange has also been pushing for similar flexibility.

That suggests the debate is less about whether public markets can function with less frequent mandatory reporting and more about which companies will actually choose to use the option. 

So the investable angle is not to guess whether every company suddenly goes dark for six months.

It is to identify the businesses most likely to be rewarded if the market starts caring a little less about quarterly theatrics and a little more about multi-year compounding.

Actionable Stuff

  • Favor long-cycle compounders. Companies that reinvest well over time could benefit if quarterly noise matters less.

  • Look for recurring revenue and strong disclosure habits. Less forced reporting makes trust and consistency more valuable.

  • Avoid businesses that rely on constant hype. If a story needs a fresh quarter every few months to stay alive, that is a tell.

  • Watch who opts in. If the rule advances, the choice to stay quarterly or go semiannual will itself send a signal.

  • Think like an owner, not a scoreboard watcher. This setup favors businesses that can create value even when the market is not checking every 90 days.

Tax Edge (Sponsored)

Capital gains taxes may quietly reduce more of your investment returns than you realize.

But the tax code includes several strategies that may help reduce that bill.

Three often-overlooked areas include investment-related expenses, cost basis adjustments, and real estate selling costs.

When structured correctly, these deductions may help minimize taxable gains.

Because the rules can be complex, many investors work with fiduciary financial advisors to plan tax-efficient strategies.

Use SmartAsset’s free tool to find vetted financial advisors serving your area.

Top Picks

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ: CDNS)

Cadence is a strong fit for a less quarter-to-quarter market because its business is built on long-duration technology spending, sticky software, and mission-critical tools used in chip and system design.

Companies do not casually rip out design software in a weak quarter, and product cycles in semis and electronics usually matter far more than one earnings season.

If reporting pressure eases even a bit, the market may become more willing to reward a company like Cadence for durable positioning instead of just next quarter’s bookings noise.

What to watch: Subscription growth, backlog visibility, and management commentary on AI-driven design demand.

Fair Isaac (NYSE: FICO)

FICO is the kind of business that tends to look even better when investors zoom out.

It has strong pricing power, entrenched positioning, and recurring economics tied to credit scoring and decision software. It does not need a flashy quarter to make the case.

It needs continued relevance, disciplined execution, and a customer base that cannot easily switch away.

In a world with less forced reporting cadence, businesses like this often stand out more because the compounding engine becomes easier to appreciate.

What to watch: Pricing trends, software segment growth, and any signs of pushback from lenders or regulators.

TransDigm Group (NYSE: TDG)

TransDigm has long been a classic long-term operator story: niche aerospace components, high aftermarket exposure, and strong pricing discipline.

It is not the type of company that needs investors constantly checking whether one quarter was a little lighter or heavier.

What matters is fleet age, flying hours, parts demand, and the company’s ability to keep converting that into cash flow.

If markets give management teams more room to execute through cycles, a business like this could be a natural beneficiary.

What to watch: Aftermarket revenue mix, margin discipline, and free cash flow conversion.

Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ: VRSK)

Verisk sits in that sweet spot where recurring data, analytics, and workflow tools create dependable value over long periods.

Insurance and risk customers use its products because they are embedded, not because they are trendy.

That makes it a strong candidate for a market that may shift slightly away from quarterly theatrics and toward steadier compounding.

It also helps that the business model is relatively clean and understandable, which becomes more important if mandatory update frequency falls.

What to watch: Organic revenue growth, retention, and margin stability across analytics segments.

Explosive Picks (Sponsored)

Most investors are happy with “nice” gains.

But a small group of stocks can deliver far more.

After filtering through thousands of companies, our research team just released a new list of 5 stocks with the best chance to gain +100% or more in the year ahead.

These stocks feature:

  • Rock-solid fundamentals for long-term growth

  • Technical indicators that often signal explosive upside

While we can’t guarantee future performance, past editions of this report have delivered gains of +175%, +498%, even +673%¹.

Free access ends at MIDNIGHT TONIGHT.

Download the report now — 100% free

Bottom Line

If quarterly reporting becomes optional, the biggest winners may not be the loudest names.

They may be the companies that already operate like long-term compounders and communicate well enough that investors do not need a forced update every three months to stay comfortable.

The play is not to chase the rule change itself. It is to own businesses that look better the less often Wall Street interrupts them.

That’s it for today’s edition—thanks for reading! Reply to this email with any feedback or let me know which macro trends or markets you’d like me to cover next.

Best Regards,
—Noah Zelvis
Macro Notes